Hackney set to debate cutting £42m investment in fossil fuels – but activists say it’s too little, too late

PUBLISHED: 18:02 24 January 2017 | UPDATED: 18:02 24 January 2017

Divest Hackney members last year during their campaign for Hackney Council to take its pension funds out of fossil fuels. Picture: Divest Hackney

Divest Hackney members last year during their campaign for Hackney Council to take its pension funds out of fossil fuels. Picture: Divest Hackney


Campaigners have dismissed Hackney Council’s plan to cut its controversial £42million investment in fossil fuels as “not moving fast or far enough”.

Divest Hackney says the council still has not done enough. Picture: Divest HackneyDivest Hackney says the council still has not done enough. Picture: Divest Hackney

After more than a year of pressure from environmental activists, the pensions committee will tonight propose cutting future CO2 emissions produced as a result of its £1.2bn pension fund by 50 per cent within six years.
CO2 emissions were estimated to be 7.11 tonnes last July when the council commissioned sustainability data company Trucost to carry out a carbon analysis on the fund.

But rather than removing money from the most polluting oil, gas and coal companies, the proposal is to recommend pension fund managers meet a new carbon target – without compromising their legal obligation to maximise on their investments.

The council’s finance chief Ian Williams told the Gazette this afternoon he believes the plans are “ambitious” considering the restrictive legal framework.

Pension fund managers must comply with the government’s asset building agenda, and must not make decisions for political reasons.

The move has been made possible because of a review looking at financial risks posed to fossil fuel investments in light of the Paris Agreement global action plan to limit global warming.

Mr Williams said: “It’s not just bureaucratic talk – this is the stark reality we are participating in, which unfortunately activists don’t want to engage in.”

But Gabriel Davalos from Divest Hackney said the council’s “ambition had failed to keep pace”.

“Hackney Council isn’t moving fast enough or far enough,” he said. “The strategy would have been appropriate a few years ago, but the financial and physical risks posed by climate change have only increased.

“We were hoping the council would step up and be a leader, protecting the pensions of Hackney as well as its residents from the risks posed by climate change. Unfortunately it looks like they are settling for much, much less. But there’s still hope.”

A final decision will be made on March 29.

Chair of the pensions committee Cllr Rob Chapman told the Gazette the move is a step towards a fossil-free pension fund.

“Carbon emissions are the biggest risk humankind has had to deal with,” he said.

“Over time we will end up with less investment in fossil fuel companies than now.”

Project accountant Rachel Cowburn explained that she had “deliberately not put a monetary amount on the target”, because that wouldn’t distinguish between the “different degrees of dirtiness” of the oil, gas and coal investments.

“What we haven’t done is to name individual companies that pose the greatest risk,” she said.

“We don’t think it’s acceptable to say to fund managers you can’t invest in these companies.”

Cllr Chapman explained: “You can’t just say to a manager ‘Sell all your things’ because that means we are undermining their management doesn’t it. Then if they don’t meet their targets they will say ‘You told us to sell that’. 
“They need to come up with strategies that better meet our requirements, and over time we will move our investments towards funds and managers that will meet our requirements.

“What we want to move to is a situation we are looking at saying: ‘This is our target, this is what we need to achieve.’ As well as the financial target we have this carbon target as well.”

In March 2015, Freedom of Information figures revealed the council was investing £42,438,296 in 22 different oil, coal and gas companies, including £2,246,655 in Exxon Mobil.

The multinational was linked to the 1989 Exxon Valdez environmental disaster, which saw 38 million gallons of crude oil spill into the remote Alaskan sea.

The coastal ecosystem there is now permanently damaged, and 28 years on some wildlife populations and habitats are listed as “not recovering”.

At the time Charlotte George from the Hackney Green party said the investment amounted to “short term thinking”.

“It’s a key issue when Hackney residents’ money is being used to prop up fossil fuel – we can’t possibly burn all the fossil fuels without screwing ourselves up,” she said.

Latest Hackney Stories

37 minutes ago

Arsenal boss Unai Emery wants to draw fans back to the Emirates for Europa League matches after a low turnout for the Gunners’ 4-2 victory over FC Vorskla Poltava.


Arsenal boss Unai Emery has hailed midfielder Lucas Torreira after the Gunners’ 4-2 Europa League victory over FC Vorskla Poltava.


Members of the Tottenham Hotspur Supporters’ Trust have helped raise £75,000 for Prostate Cancer UK over the last three years


The latest boxing news from Hackney


West Ham United will want to build on their first win in the Premier League when they host Chelsea at the London Stadium on Sunday.


Bernd Leno has been speaking to the Islington Gazette after making his debut in the Europa League against Vorskla Poltava at the Emirates on Thursday evening.


Barkingside boss Michael Walther comes up against former club Clapton when they visit in the Essex Senior League on Friday night, writes Ned Keating.

The experienced manager backed Mauricio Pochettino to guide Spurs out of this current tricky period


‘Fostering has been really positive for me, I have no regrets whatsoever.’

Education and Training


Read the
Education and Training
e-edition today

Read Now

Newsletter Sign Up

Hackney Gazette twice-weekly newsletter
Sign up to receive our regular email newsletter

Our Privacy Policy

Most read news

Show Job Lists