Rashan Charles: Police taking no responsibility for death has set back community relations by generations – family
- Credit: Picture: Emma Bartholomew
The family of Rashan Charles say police not taking any responsibility for his death has set back community relations by “generations”.
They also said they will continue their search for answers after an inquest found his death was an accident after “justified use of force” by a police officer.
Jurors at St Pancras Coroner’s Court returned their narrative verdict today after two weeks of evidence at St Pancras Coroner’s Court.
They found Rashan demonstrated resistance during restraint, and the police officer brought him to the ground to get better control of him through “justified use of force”.
They said the officer – referred to throughout the inquest as BX47 – did not follow prescribed police protocol for when someone is not breathing and suspected of swallowing drugs.
You may also want to watch:
They also said the impact of a bystander who assisted in the restraint was not managed by the officer who failed to call an ambulance using the override button on his police radio.
But they said none of the actions taken by the police medic or paramedics contributed to Rashan’s death.
- 1 "Outcry" over fortnightly rubbish collection in Stamford Hill
- 2 Three men who went on stabbing spree in Hackney convicted of murder
- 3 Campaigners to protest at GP surgeries as outrage grows over US takeover
- 4 "Predator" jailed after sexually assaulting sleeping woman on Hackney bus
- 5 Reopening week saw “record-breaking” days at pubs in Hoxton
- 6 Three men charged following Hackney shooting
- 7 Hackney restaurant exhibits local artists with new art space
- 8 Hackney service remembers Prince Philip, 'rock of the nation'
- 9 Hackney schoolgirl and actress Bukky Bakray wins Bafta
- 10 Hackney volunteers tend to Overground station gardens
Speaking after the findings, Rashan’s family said in a statement: “Rashan Charles was a young father and an integral part of his family. He is greatly missed by all of us.
“We believe the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) investigation was flawed from the outset.
“We were left out of key decisions, evidence was excluded, police worn video missing and time frames manipulated.
“The submissions by the family barrister were overturned in court and evidence dismissed. However, it is important we afford due respect to the jury who had to make a decision based on the limited evidence and confines put upon them.
“The two expert witnesses on restraint had 75 years combined service in the Met police, and one still serving.
“This appears to us neither objective, independent or impartial. The police projected a criminal caricature of Rashan even after his death. This successfully served to detract from the events of 22nd July 2017.
“We are not adversaries of the police. This is about the conduct of individual police officers. However, the absence of admission of any responsibility does not stall community relations by weeks or years, but sets it back generations.
“This part of the flawed system is over, our work to receive answers continues.”