Boundary review: Hackney MP says ‘undemocratic’ plans ignore thousands of voters
- Credit: Archant
MP Meg Hillier has labelled the boundary review set to shake up Hackney’s constituencies as “undemocratic” because it ignores thousands of the borough’s voters.
The Boundary Commission review aims to redraw the borders to balance the number of voters in each area, while reducing the number of seats from 650 to 600.
But it is based on electorate figures from last year when a new individual registration system was brought in, and does not include the thousands of people in Hackney who didn’t sign up in time.
About 30,000 people were wiped off the register in Hackney, but figures have since risen by more than 10 per cent from 163,626 to 180,145.
The proposals include abolishing both constituencies – Hackney North and Stoke Newington and Hackney South and Shoreditch – and replacing them with Hackney West and Bethnal Green, Hackney Central and Finsbury Park and Stoke Newington.
You may also want to watch:
Ms Hillier said: “The review doesn’t take into consideration the thousands of people in Hackney who registered to vote in the last year, including those in the run up to the EU referendum. Ignoring these voters is unfair and undemocratic.
“It is still early days. This is a long process and things can change dramatically over the next two years.”
- 1 Fears soft play centre Kidzmania could be at threat due to flats plan
- 2 Residents' thoughts on Stoke Newington Church Street LTN
- 3 Helen Anderson: Finsbury Park murder victim's father pays tribute to his daughter
- 4 McDonald's boycott backed by Diane Abbott, Hackney MP
- 5 Letter on LTN scheme in Stoke Newington
- 6 Hackney Half runners prepare for the fitness festival weekend
- 7 Five things to do in Hackney and Islington this weekend (September 25-56)
- 8 A sneak peak of what's in store for Black History Season in Hackney
- 9 Cinema set to open in Finsbury Park in time for No Time to Die
- 10 Sadiq Khan urged to denounce £1.2bn Edmonton incinerator
Her views were echoed by John Page of social justice campaign group Hackney Unites, who said the government was trying to get a head start ahead of the General Election by not using up-to-date figures.
He told the Gazette: “It’s clear there wasn’t enough time given to local authorities. It under-represents urban and inner city areas, and particularly places like Hackney where there’s a high level of private sector renting going on where people move regularly.
“This government is determined to push through with these changes, despite knowing they will adversely impact on the quality of our democracy. It would give them a head start of 25-30 seats.
“It’s not as if the current boundaries are perfect, but they need to be redrawn on the basis of current data. They’ve rushed the process to meet the deadline for the next General Election.
“We could end up with a government that’s in power because people in Hackney haven’t had their voices heard to the same extent as people in Hampstead or Westminster.”
Diane Abbott did not respond to a request for comment on the possible abolition of her constituency, which she has represented for 29 years.
The Gazette did, however, receive two press releases from her office the same day about national health issues concerning her role as shadow health minister.