Stoke Newington landlord handed £40,000 court bill for dodgy roof extension
- Credit: Archant
Ignoring demands to tear down an illegal roof extension has earned a Stoke Newington landlord a £40,000 court fine – and its director an arrest warrant.
Sternglade Ltd was told to cough up the cash at Thames Magistrates’ Court earlier this month, having already been billed £4,700 in fines and costs over the same issue in 2010.
The roof of the large Victorian villa, let out as flats, had been built up at the back and side of the Evering Road property without planning permission.
Hackney Council took enforcement action telling the landlord to take it down in 2009 but was ignored, hence the 2010 conviction.
The developers then got planning permission for an acceptable alternative to the development – but even then did nothing to change it.
As well as the £40,000 fine, Sternglade was also billed £1,760 for the town hall’s costs, as well as a victim surcharge of £170.
Director Michael Scharf, who was also charged with the same offence repeatedly failed to go to court and a warrant is now out for his arrest.
- 1 Hackney high streets to get funding boost
- 2 Man 'threw toolbox' at woman's head at Overground station
- 3 Met officer sacked for concealing proceeds of husband's crimes
- 4 Video shows jewellers in Stamford Hill robbed twice in two months
- 5 Court shown moment man is arrested in the road naked after 'ferocious' attack on girlfriend
- 6 Boris Johnson tells people to work from home as covid 'Plan B' confirmed
- 7 Pay cut decision overturned after council worker strike
- 8 First-of-its-kind De Beauvoir event brings women and the police together
- 9 'We're sorry': Hackney Council apologises after pandemic repairs backlog
- 10 Dedicated police team set up for Shoreditch Town Centre
The council’s planning boss Cllr Guy Nicholson, said: “This company not only ignored the Council’s enforcement notice but even when they had the chance to correct the works they didn’t take this opportunity.
“The council is there to apply planning rules that support and enable safe and appropriate development in the borough. However, we won’t hesitate to take legal action if those rules are broken and no effort is made to rectify an unauthorised development.”